Page 131 of 131
21 (return)
[ NOTE U, p. 412. The pope
at first gave Cardinal Pole powers to transact only with regard to the
past fruits of the church lands; but being admonished of the danger
attending any attempt towards a resumption of the lands, he enlarged the
cardinal’s powers, and granted him authority to insure the future
possession of the church lands to the present proprietors. There was only
one clause in the cardinal’s powers that has given occasion for some
speculation. An exception was made of such cases as Pole should think
important enough to merit the being communicated to the holy see. But Pole
simply ratified the possession of all the church lands; and his commission
had given him full powers to that purpose. See Harleian Miscellany, vol.
vii. p. 264, 266. It is true, some councils have declared, that it exceeds
even the power of the pope to alienate any church lands; and the pope,
according to his convenience or power, may either adhere to, or recede
from, this declaration. But every year gave solidity to the right of the
proprietors of church lands, and diminished the authority of the popes; so
that men’s dread of popery in subsequent times was more founded on party
or religious zeal, than on very solid reasons.]
22 (return)
[ NOTE V, p. 448. The
passage of Holingshed, in the Discourse prefixed to his History, and which
some ascribe to Harrison, is as follows. Speaking of the increase of
luxury: “Neither do I speak this in reproach, of any man, God is my judge;
but to show that I do rejoice rather to see how God has blessed us with
his good gifts, and to behold how that in a time wherein all things are
grown to most excessive prices, we do yet find the means to obtain and
archive such furniture as heretofore has been impossible. There are old
men yet dwelling in the village where I remain, which have noted three
things to be marvellously altered in England, within their sound
remembrance. One is, the multitude of chimnies lately erected; whereas in
their young days, there were not above two or three, if so many, in most
uplandish towns of the realm; (the religious houses and manor-places of
their lords always excepted, and peradventure some great personage;) but
each made his fire against a reredosse in the hall where he dined and
dressed his meat. The second is, the great amendment of lodging; for, said
they, our fathers and we ourselves have lain full oft upon straw pallettes
covered only with a sheet under coverlets made of dagswaine or hopharlots,
(I use their own terms,) and a good round log under their head instead of
a bolster. If it were so, that the father or the goodman of the house had
a matrass or flock-bed, and thereto a sack of chaff to rest his head upon,
he thought himself to be as well lodged as the lord of the town, so well
were they contented. Pillows, said they, were thought meet only for women
in childbed. As for servants, if they had any sheet above them, it was
well; for seldom had they any under their bodies to keep them from the
prickling straws, that ran oft through the canvass, and razed their
hardened hydes. The third thing they tell of is, the exchange of treene
platers (so called, I suppose, from tree or wood) into pewter, and wooden
spoons into silver or tin. For so common were all sorts of treene vessels
in old time, that a man should hardly find four pieces of pewter (of which
one was peradventure a salt) in a good farmer’s house.” Description of
Britain, chap. x. Again, in chap. xvi.: “In times past, men were contented
to dwell in houses builded of sallow, willow, etc.; so that the use of the
oak was in a manner dedicated wholly unto churches, religious houses,
princes’ palaces, navigation, etc., but now sallow, etc., are rejected,
and nothing but oak any where regarded. And yet see the change; for when
our houses were builded of willow, then had we oaken men; but now that our
houses are come to be made of oak, our men are not only become willow, but
a great many altogether of straw, which is a sore alteration. In these the
courage of the owner was a sufficient defence to keep the house in safety;
but now the assurance of the timber must defend the men from robbing. Now
have we many chimnies; and yet out tender**** complain of rheums,
catarrhs, and poses; then had we none but reredosses, and our heads did
never ache. For as the smoke in those days was supposed to be a sufficient
hardening for the timber of the house, so it was reputed a far better
medicine to keep the good man and his family from the quacke or pose,
wherewith, as then, very few were acquainted.” Again, in chap. xviii.:
“Our pewterers in time past employed the use of pewter only upon dishes
and pots, and a few other trifles for service; whereas now, they are grown
into such exquisite cunning, that they can in manner imitate by infusion
any form or fashion of cup, dish, salt, or bowl or goblet, which is made
by goldsmith’s craft, though they be never so curious, and very
artificially forged. In some places beyond the sea, a garnish of good flat
English pewter (I say flat, because dishes and platers in my time begin to
be made deep, and like basons, and are indeed more convenient, both for
sauce and keeping the meat warm) is almost esteemed so precious as the
like number of vessels that are made of fine silver.” If the reader is
curious to know the hour of meals in Queen Elizabeth’s reign, he may learn
it from the same author. “With us the nobility, gentry, and students, do
ordinarily go to dinner at eleven before noon, and to supper at five, or
between five and six at afternoon. The merchants dine and sup seldom
before twelve at noon and six at night, especially in London. The
husbandmen dine also at high noon, as they call it, and sup at seven or
eight; but out of term in our universities the scholars dine at ten.”
Froissart mentions waiting on the duke of Lancaster at five
o’clock in the afternoon, when he had supped. These hours are still more
early. It is hard to tell, why, all over the world, as the age becomes
more luxurious, the hours become later. Is it the crowd of amusements that
push on the hours gradually? or are the people of fashion better pleased
with the secrecy and silence of nocturnal hours, when the industrious
vulgar are all gone to rest? In rude ages, men have few amusements or
occupations but what daylight affords them.
END OF VOL. III