The History of England in Three Volumes, Vol.I., Part E.


Page 135 of 159



At length, a motion in form was made by Alderman Pack, one of the city members, for investing the protector with the dignity of king. This motion at first excited great disorder, and divided the whole house into parties. The chief opposition came from the usual adherents of the protector, the major-generals, and such officers as depended on them. Lambert a man of deep intrigue, and of great interest in the army, had long entertained the ambition of succeeding Cromwell in the protectorship; and he foresaw, that if the monarchy were restored, hereditary right would also be established, and the crown be transmitted to the posterity of the prince first elected. He pleaded, therefore, conscience; and rousing all those civil and religious jealousies against kingly government, which had been so industriously encouraged among the soldiers, and which served them as a pretence for so many violences, he raised a numerous, and still more formidable party, against the motion.

On the other hand, the motion was supported by every one who was more particularly devoted to the protector, and who hoped, by so acceptable a measure, to pay court to the prevailing authority. Many persons also, attached to their country, despaired of ever being able to subvert the present illegal establishment; and were desirous, by fixing it on ancient foundations, to induce the protector, from views of his own safety, to pay a regard to the ancient laws and liberties of the kingdom. Even the royalists imprudently joined in the measure; and hoped that, when the question regarded only persons, not forms of government, no one would any longer balance between the ancient royal family and an ignoble usurper, who, by blood, treason, and perfidy, had made his way to the throne.

1657.

The bill was voted by a considerable majority; and a committee was appointed to reason with the protector, and to overcome those scruples which he pretended against accepting so liberal an offer.

The conference lasted for several days. The committee urged, that all the statutes and customs of England were founded on the supposition of regal authority, and could not, without extreme violence, be adjusted to any other form of government: that a protector, except during the minority of a king, was a name utterly unknown to the laws; and no man was acquainted with the extent or limits of his authority; that if it were attempted to define every part of his jurisdiction, many years, if not ages, would be required for the execution of so complicated a work; if the whole power of the king were at once transferred to him, the question was plainly about a name, and the preference was indisputably due to the ancient title: that the English constitution was more anxious concerning the form of government, than concerning the birthright of the first magistrate; and had provided, by an express law of Henry VII., for the security of those who act in defence of the king in being, by whatever means he might have acquired possession: that it was extremely the interest of all his highness’s friends to seek the shelter of this statute; and even the people in general were desirous of such a settlement, and in all juries were with great difficulty induced to give their verdict in favor of a protector: that the great source of all the late commotions had been the jealousy of liberty: and that a republic, together with a protector, had been established in order to provide further securities for the freedom of the constitution; but that by experience the remedy had been found insufficient, even dangerous and pernicious; since every indeterminate power, such as that of a protector, must be arbitrary; and the more arbitrary, as it was contrary to the genius and inclination of the people.

The difficulty consisted not in persuading Cromwell. He was sufficiently convinced of the solidity of these reasons; and his inclination, as well as judgment, was entirely on the side of the committee. But how to bring over the soldiers to the same way of thinking, was the question. The office of king had been painted to them in such horrible colors, that there were no hopes of reconciling them suddenly to it, even though bestowed upon their general, to whom they were so much devoted. A contradiction, open and direct, to all past professions, would make them pass, in the eyes of the whole nation, for the most shameless hypocrites, enlisted, by no other than mercenary motives, in the cause of the most perfidious traitor. Principles, such as they were, had been encouraged in them by every consideration, human and divine; and though it was easy, where interest concurred, to deceive them by the thinnest disguises, it might be found dangerous at once to pull off the mask, and to show them in a full light the whole crime and deformity of their conduct. Suspended between these fears and his own most ardent desires, Cromwell protracted the time, and seemed still to oppose the reasonings of the committee; in hopes that by artifice he might be able to reconcile the refractory minds of the soldiers to his new dignity.

While the protector argued so much in contradiction both to his judgment and inclination, it is no wonder that his elocution, always confused, embarrassed, and unintelligible, should be involved in tenfold darkness, and discover no glimmering of common sense or reason. An exact account of this conference remains, and may be regarded as a great curiosity. The members of the committee in their reasonings discover judgment, knowledge, elocution: Lord Broghill in particular exerts himself on this memorable occasion. But what a contrast when we pass to the protector’s replies! After so singular a manner does nature distribute her talents, that, in a nation abounding with sense and learning, a man who, by superior personal merit alone, had made his way to supreme dignity, and had even obliged the parliament to make him a tender of the crown, was yet incapable of expressing himself on this occasion, but in a manner which a peasant of the most ordinary capacity would justly be ashamed of.[*]

* We shall produce any passage at random; for his discourse
is all of a piece. “I confess, for it behoves me to deal
plainly with you, I must confess, I would say, I hope I may
be understood in this; for indeed I must be tender what I
say to such an audience as this; I say, I would be
understood, that in this argument I do not make parallel
betwixt men of a different mind, and a parliament, which
shall have their desires. I know there is no comparison, nor
can it be urged upon me that my words have the least color
that way, because the parliament seems to give liberty to me
to say any thing to you; as that, that is a tender of my
humble reasons and judgment and opinion to them; and if I
think they are such, and will be such to them, and are
faithful servants, and will be so to the supreme authority,
and the legislative wheresoever it is: if, I say, I should
not tell you, knowing their minds to be so, I should not be
faithful if I should not tell you so, to the end you may
report it to the parliament: I shall say something for
myself, for my own mind, I do profess it, I urn not a man
scrupulous about words or names of such things I have not;
but as I have the word of God, and I hope I shall ever have
it, for the rule of my conscience, for my informations; so
truly men that have been led in dark paths, through the
providence and dispensation of God; why, surely it is not to
be objected to a man; for who can love to walk in the dark?
But providence does so dispose. And though a man may impute
his own folly and blindness to providence sinfully, yet it
must be at my peril; the case may be that it is the
providence of God that doth lead men in darkness: I must
need say, that I have had a great deal of experience of
providence; and though it is no rule without or against the
word, yet it is a very good expositor of the word in many
cases.” Conference at Whitehall. The great defect in
Oliver’s speeches consists not in his want of elocution, but
in his want of ideas. The sagacity of his actions, and the
absurdity of his discourse, form the most prodigious
contrast that ever was known. The collection of all his
speeches, letters, sermons, (for he also wrote sermons,)
would make a great curiosity, and, with a few exceptions,
might justly pass for one of the most nonsensical books in
the world.


Free Learning Resources