Leibniz's New Essays Concerning the Human Understanding


Index



Transcriber's Notes:

Every effort has been made to replicate this text as faithfully as possible, including inconsistencies in spelling and hyphenation.

Some corrections of spelling and punctuation have been made. They are marked like this in the text. The original text appears when hovering the cursor over the marked text. A list of amendments is at the end of the text.

GERMAN PHILOSOPHICAL CLASSICS
FOR
ENGLISH READERS AND STUDENTS.

EDITED BY
GEORGE S. MORRIS.


LEIBNIZ'S NEW ESSAYS CONCERNING
THE HUMAN UNDERSTANDING.

LEIBNIZ'S
NEW ESSAYS CONCERNING THE
HUMAN UNDERSTANDING.

A CRITICAL EXPOSITION.

By JOHN DEWEY, Ph.D.,

ASSISTANT PROFESSOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN THE UNIVERSITY OF
MICHIGAN, AND PROFESSOR (ELECT) OF MENTAL AND
MORAL PHILOSOPHY IN THE UNIVERSITY
OF MINNESOTA


CHICAGO:
SCOTT, FORESMAN AND COMPANY
1902

Copyright, 1888,
By S. C. Griggs and Company.

PREFACE.

The purpose of the series of which the present volume is one, is not, as will be seen by reference to the statement in the initial volume, to sum up in toto the system of any philosopher, but to give a "critical exposition" of some one masterpiece. In treating the "Nouveaux Essais" of Leibniz, I have found myself obliged, at times, to violate the letter of this expressed intention, in order to fulfil its spirit. The "Nouveaux Essais," in spite of its being one of the two most extended philosophical writings of Leibniz, is a compendium of comments, rather than a connected argument or exposition. It has all the suggestiveness and richness of a note-book, but with much also of its fragmentariness. I have therefore been obliged to supplement my account of it by constant references to the other writings of Leibniz, and occasionally to take considerable liberty with the order of the treatment of topics. Upon the whole, this book will be found, I hope, to be a faithful reflex not only of Leibniz's thought, but also of his discussions in the "Nouveaux Essais."

In the main, the course of philosophic thought since the time of Leibniz has been such as to render almost self-evident his limitations, and to suggest needed corrections and amplifications. Indeed, it is much easier for those whose thoughts follow the turn that Kant has given modern thinking to appreciate the defects of Leibniz than to realize his greatness. I have endeavored, therefore, in the body of the work, to identify my thought with that of Leibniz as much as possible, to assume his standpoint and method, and, for the most part, to confine express criticism upon his limitations to the final chapter. In particular, I have attempted to bring out the relations of philosophy to the growing science of his times, to state the doctrine of pre-established harmony as he himself meant it, and to give something like consistency and coherency to his doctrine of material existence and of nature. This last task seemed especially to require doing. I have also endeavored to keep in mind, throughout, Leibniz's relations to Locke, and to show the "Nouveaux Essais" as typical of the distinction between characteristic British and German thought.

JOHN DEWEY.

May, 1888.

CONTENTS.

CHAPTER I.
The Man.
  PAGE
His Parents 1
His Early Education 2
His University Training at Leipsic 4
At Jena 8
At the University of Altdorf 10
His Removal to Frankfurt 10
His Mission to Paris 11
Discovery of the Calculus 12
Librarian at Hanover 13
His Activities 14
His Philosophic Writings 15
His Ecclesiastic and Academic Projects 17
His Later Years and Death 18
CHAPTER II.
Sources of his Philosophy.
Character of the Epoch into which Leibniz was born 20
The Thought of the Unity of the World 23
The two Agencies which formed Leibniz's Philosophy 24
The Cartesian Influences 26
Rationalistic Method 28
Mechanical Explanation of Nature 30
Application of Mathematics 32
Idea of Evolution 33
Interpretation of these Ideas 35
Idea of Activity or Entelechy 39
Idea of Rationality 40
Idea of Organism 42
CHAPTER III.
The Problem and its Solution.
Unity of Leibniz's Thought 43
Relation of Universal and Individual 44
Descartes' Treatment of this Question 46
Spinoza's Treatment of it 48
Leibniz's Solution 50
All Unity is Spiritual 53
And Active 54
Is a Representative Individual 56
Contrast of Monad and Atom 58
Pre-established Harmony reconciles Universal and Individual 59
Meaning of this Doctrine 62
CHAPTER IV.
Locke and Leibniz.—Innate Ideas.
Necessity of Preliminary Account of Leibniz's Philosophy 66
Locke's Empiricism 67
Leibniz's Comments upon Locke 69
The Controversies of Leibniz 72
The Essay on the Human Understanding 73
Locke's Denial of Innate Ideas 75
Depending upon
(1) His Mechanical Conception of Innate Ideas 77
Leibniz undermines this by substituting an Organic Conception 80
And upon
(2) His Mechanical Conception of Consciousness 84
Leibniz refutes this by his Theory of Unconscious Intelligence 85
CHAPTER V.
Sensation and Experience.
Importance of Doctrine regarding Sensation 87
The Two Elements of Locke's Notion of Sensation 89
Its Relation to the Object producing it: Primary and Secondary Qualities 91
Locke criticized as to his Account
(1) Of the Production of Sensation 92
(2) Of its Function in Knowledge 95
The Meaning of Physical Causation 97
Bearing of this Doctrine upon Relation of Soul and Body 98
Criticism of Locke's Dualism 98
Leibniz's Monism 101
Summary of Discussion 103
Leibniz on the Relation of Sensations to Objects occasioning them 105
Nature of Experience 106
Distinction of Empirical from Rational Knowledge 107
CHAPTER VI.
The Impulses and the Will.
The Doctrine of Will depends upon that of Intelligence 109
The Character of Impulse 111
Of Desire 112
Half-Pains and Pleasures 113
The Outcome of Desire 115
Nature of Moral Action 117
Of Freedom 118
(1) Freedom as Contingency 119
Limitation of this Principle 121
(2) Freedom as Spontaneity 123
This Principle is too Broad to be a Moral Principle 125
(3) True Freedom is Rational Action 125
Our Lack of Freedom is due to our Sensuous Nature 128
Innate Practical Principles 129
Moral Science is Demonstrative 130
CHAPTER VII.
Matter and its Relation to Spirit.
Locke's Account of Matter and Allied Ideas the Foundation of the Philosophy of Nature Characteristic of British Empiricism 132
Space and Matter wholly Distinct Ideas 134
Leibniz gives Matter a Metaphysical Basis 137
Ordinary Misunderstanding of Leibniz's Ideas of Matter 138
Matter is not composed of Monads 139
Matter is the Passive or Conditioned Side of Monads 140
Passivity equals "Confused Representations," i. e. Incomplete Development of Reason 144
Matter is logically Necessary from Leibniz's Principles 145
Bearing of Discussion upon Doctrine of Pre-established Harmony 146
Summary 147
CHAPTER VIII.
Material Phenomena and their Reality.
What is the Connection between Matter as Metaphysical and as Physical? 151
The Latter is the "Image" of the Former 151
Leibniz's Reaction from Cartesian Theory 152
His Objections are (1) Physical and (2) Logical 153
(1) Motion is Source of Physical Qualities of Bodies 155
Hence there are no Atoms 158
Secondary Qualities as well as Primary depend upon Motion 160
(2) What is the Subject to which the Quality of Extension belongs? 161
It is the Monad as Passive 162
Space and Time connect the Spiritual and the Sensible 164
Distinction between Space and Time, and Extension and Duration 166
Space and Time are Relations 167
Leibniz's Controversy with Clarke 168
Leibniz denies that Space and Time are Absolute 170
What is the Reality of Sensible Phenomena? 173
It consists
(1) In their Regularity 174
(2) In their Dependence upon Intelligence and Will 175
Leibniz and Berkeley 177
CHAPTER IX.
Some Fundamental Conceptions.
Locke's Account of Substance as Static 179
The Distinction between Reality and Phenomena 180
Leibniz's Conception of Substance as Dynamic 181
His Specific Criticisms upon Locke 182
The Categories of Identity and Difference Locke also explains in a Mechanical Way 183
Leibniz regards them as Internal and as Organic to each other 184
Locke gives a Quantitative Notion of Infinity 188
And hence makes our Idea of it purely Negative 189
Leibniz denies that the True Notion of Infinity is Quantitative 189
He also denies Locke's Account of the Origin of the Indefinite 192
In General, Locke has a Mechanical Idea, Leibniz a Spiritual, of these Categories 193
CHAPTER X.
The Nature and Extent of Knowledge.
Locke's Definition and Classification of Knowledge 196
Leibniz's Criticism 197
Leibniz, Berkeley, and Kant regarding Knowledge of Objects 198
The Degrees of Knowledge,—Intuitive, Demonstrative, and Sensitive 199
Locke's Contradictory Theories regarding the Origin of Knowledge 202
Locke starts both with the Individual as given to Consciousness and with the Unrelated Sensation 204
Either Theory makes Relations or "Universals" Unreal 205
As to the Extent of Knowledge, that of Identity is Wide, but Trifling 205
That of Real Being includes God, Soul, and Matter, but only as to their Existence 206
And even this at the Expense of contradicting his Definition of Knowledge 206
Knowledge of Co-existence is either Trifling or Impossible 207
Leibniz rests upon Distinction of Contingent and Rational Truth 209
The Former may become the Latter, and is then Demonstrative 210
The Means of this Transformation are Mathematics and Classification 215
There are Two Principles,—One of Contradiction 217
The Other of Sufficient Reason 218
The Latter leads us to God as the Supreme Intelligence and the Final Condition of Contingent Fact 219
The Four Stages of Knowledge 222
CHAPTER XI.
The Theology of Leibniz.
Leibniz's Three Arguments for the Existence of God 224
The Value of the Ontological 225
The Cosmological 226
The Teleological 226
The Attributes of God 227
The Relation of God to the World, his Creating Activity 228
Creation involves Wisdom and Goodness as well as Power 229
The Relation of God to Intelligent Spirits: they form a Moral Community 230
Leibniz as the Founder of Modern German Ethical Systems 231
The End of Morality is Happiness as Self-realization 232
The Three Stages of Natural Right 234
The Basis of Both Leibniz's Ethics and Political Philosophy is Man's Relation to God 236
His sthetics have the Same Basis 237
Man's Spirit as Architectonic 238
CHAPTER XII.
Criticism and Conclusion.
Leibniz's Fundamental Contradiction is between his Method and his Subject Matter 240
The Use which Leibniz makes of the Principle of Sufficient Reason reveals this Contradiction 242
The Contradiction is between the Ideas of Formal and of Concrete Unity 243
From this Contradiction flow
(1) The Contradiction in the Notion of Individuality 246
Which becomes purely Negative 247
The Negative he interprets as merely Privative 249
(2) The Contradiction in his Conception of God has the Same Source 250
He really has Three Definitions of God 250
One results in Atomism, another in Pantheism 251
The Third in a Conception of the Organic Harmony of the Infinite and Finite 252
(3) The Contradiction between the Real and the Ideal in the Monads has the Same Source 253
(4) As have also the Contradictions in the Treatment of the Relations of Matter and Spirit 254
(5) And finally, his Original Contradiction leads to a Contradictory Treatment of Knowledge 257
Summary as to the Positive Value of Leibniz 259
The Influence of Leibniz's Philosophy 261
Especially upon Kant 262
Kant claims to be the True Apologist for Leibniz 263
(1) As to the Doctrine of Sufficient Reason and Contradiction 263
Which finds its Kantian Analogue in the Distinction between Analytic and Synthetic Judgment 266
(2) As to the Relation of Monads and Matter 268
Which finds its Kantian Analogue in the Relation of the Sensuous and Supersensuous 268
(3) And finally, as to the Doctrine of Pre-established Harmony 269
Which Kant transforms into Harmony between Understanding and Sense 269
And between the Categories of the Understanding and the Ideas of Reason 270
Conclusion 272


Free Learning Resources